I don’t remember when i established my del.icio.us account, but after the initial “rush” of using it, i pretty much ignored it. For week 3’s assignment, I revisited my account and what i found was, i had tagged a lot of stuff i no longer use, and in fact, probably never had use for beyond the initial reading. I think there’s definitely a use in a professional setting, but it requires more work than simply clicking around and adding links that look good.
Pros of del.icio.us:
- your bookmarks are available anywhere you have an Internet connection (and del.icio.us isn’t a blocked site)
- you can see how others have tagged a bookmark
- you can see other sites/pages assigned the same tag
- you can see sites others have felt were worthy of bookmarking
- RSS feed of your bookmarks can be displayed on your blog or webpage
The most obvious cons of del.icio.us are indicative of typical problems in information classification and retrieval.
Cons of del.icio.us:
- Lack of controlled vocabulary - Since librarians tend to have access to subject classifications like Sears and LCSH, i don’t think this is a huge problem but it’s a con none-the-less.
- Finding related sites dependent on others using same tag - Non-librarians aren’t necessarily going to choose from a controlled vocabulary, thus the term they use may not match the term you use. Homographs and inconsistent choice of tags – as in choosing between “bikes” or “bicycles” – limit the benefit of this feature
- Too easy to add links “just because” resulting in increased recall at the expense of precision.